Stabilizer.

User avatar
Логик
Posts:2073
Joined:Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:43
Location:Россия
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Логик » Mon Dec 06, 2010 19:23

Druze then, to find not the problem, though quartz, amethyst though, the main thing is whether in the process of producing the stabilizer?
I have a suspicion that there is not so simple...

User avatar
Маг.нет
Posts:3310
Joined:Fri Apr 16, 2010 12:48
Location:Сибирь
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 142 times

Post by Маг.нет » Mon Dec 06, 2010 19:43

Логик wrote: there is not so simple...
I think so too... and the materials can be different, it is important to "attached" properties and "difficult" fill in a metal bowl drosou center and stickers (not too simple, engraved) areas in a circle (as the picture). I will mention again, fill the "difficult" - diverse.


Sincerely, MAG.no

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Mon Dec 06, 2010 20:24

Логик wrote:Michael_
If not a secret, Druse for the regulator, it's just a Druse or the "program"? In the process of producing the stabilizer makes sense to use druses of quartz or not?
about the production I will do it.
Druse 2.0, but 1.0 is self-charging.
Preferably Druse of amethyst (think you can find) on quartz other properties (just don't ask for words to explain why I can't, just know that it is so necessary).

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Mon Dec 06, 2010 20:27

fill there really not simple, but in General, its certainly a kind can be played, the hardest part is the fact that it is not possible to specify a reasonable method of reproduction of some inclusions in it, but the idea of advice for the homebrew - is.
Another thing is that to begin with, and paper homemade stabilizer will work...

User avatar
Логик
Posts:2073
Joined:Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:43
Location:Россия
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Логик » Mon Dec 06, 2010 20:31

Thanks for the reply.
And the size of the Druze matter?

Going to go for crystals, here I think, maybe, something to grab along the way...

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Mon Dec 06, 2010 20:33

not significant. Small enough, of course if the stabilizer is not the size of a room.

User avatar
Логик
Posts:2073
Joined:Sat Feb 21, 2009 10:43
Location:Россия
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Post by Логик » Mon Dec 06, 2010 20:33

Михаил_ wrote:Another thing is that to begin with, and paper homemade stabilizer will work...
We are not looking for easy ways... :)

User avatar
Смелый
Posts:2720
Joined:Thu Nov 19, 2009 13:19
Location:Владивосток
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 79 times

Post by Смелый » Tue Dec 07, 2010 4:13

Dimas wrote:Michael_
And unskilled packing...
Even some skilled, the space under the stabilizer padded very thickly cutting from the shredder, the top filled with packing "popcorn" to lock under pressure,for secure attachment, box chose the largest, proportionate to the diameter of the device, all wrapped with tape, the device in the box was firmly fixed...a no, and experience in the packaging, thank God, there are :)
So only the first and the only factor.
If you purchased the device arrived to destination in a damaged condition, then the problem is in the receiver. And then at least pour the product in a concrete block and send it to the recipient - will still be a nerd with a sledgehammer and a jackhammer that picks open the shell and damage the forwarded device. So, from the point of view of such knowledge - neither the sender nor the carrier - and.

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:15

Let's not not knowing the situation to Express unfounded opinions. OK? In this case, the problem is still in the carrier and in the package, even if he Packed up everything OK, the product is very peculiar. And the problem here is not the recipient, but the fact that I did a Stabilizer, and then write that the problem is in me :)
Just a stumble on the real difficulties, including physical injury (for example) in the manufacture of the first бж1.0 - there is resistance in the world, it is neither bad nor good, but simply a sign that a factor having an impact on what is happening, there is still in the same place.
Well, after this factor is "cleared" everything becomes softer and straining does not occur. Ie in this case is a good sign.
But that did not break, a huge dish needed to pack, and wrote me the recipient, in the materials, which simply weren't in the office. Ie, Dmitry worked on the standard scheme, but it is in this case not sufficient.
I can still paraphrase. For the carriage of powerful artifacts sometimes need special conditions. In case of technical impossibility to provide necessary to provide the maximum available. At the current moment this is the only shipment of the Stabilizer modification "B".

I do many things strange (in everyday matters), many relatives a little tired. Do like in that old story, where the boy had two tickets and another one. Why? because "breaks" where fine, but when you do something outside of everyday life, then attempts to break there are many. Moreover, I specifically do not leave an important place for me, so that they "rushed".

In this case, from everyday experience and acquaintances, I know that, due to some peretrubatsy in the mail-EMS, the number of delivered packages with broken package and literally chewed content is about 15-20% (last 2-3 weeks). It is not an exaggeration, our friends get a lot of packages (almost every day, and not one person, different people). It is obvious that this large percentage. If you add a non-standard load + the fact that the office was not informed of need to pack take :) it becomes clear that the recipient there is absolutely no side.

So from the point of view of such knowledge :) You are not right.<

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Tue Dec 07, 2010 5:20

Логик wrote:
Михаил_ wrote:Another thing is that to begin with, and paper homemade stabilizer will work...
We are not looking for easy ways... :)
Well, we'll have no light :)

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Tue Dec 07, 2010 6:08

We will continue to describe the possible ways of application of the Stabilizer.

For starters, you may want to investigate why the device is a Stabilizer, and so he is, regardless of what it is to him "pegged" and even regardless of where attached. Ie even the anchor is placed in the zone of Chaos is still some way to stabilize the anchored object, though, and pass it a specific signal. Why?
The fact is that the Stabilizer is supposed to be pictures of our picture of the world. In other words, it is that we include a picture of the world and makes the objects more stable in it.
Really have long noticed a common occurrence when appliances of different kinds begins to work well in the presence of a master or a man with her "on you". It is connected with this effect, but it works WITHOUT the device. The effect is known to physicists, and of us on the same sensor "Celeron" and in fact, with the bridge of a pair of resistors worked Kozyrev, measuring the impact of reality on them. Ie in the case of a man "technology fears", it's not that it broadcasts a "Homo"stabilizing the signal, the person can be all of a chaotic, but he KNOWS how the technique should work and represents himself as a kind of framework within which it drives.
At the time, I was faced with the fact that for the same reason, the programmer who wrote the complex software product, almost never can find a fault with it. It is that the program works as it should, and does not perform such actions that lead him according to the algorithm in the area where the triggering error of the algorithm at all possible. Ie all tests, he carefully circles around the problem areas, is absolutely not acting consciously.
In fact, when these actions, the operator has a way of running something (and it's not necessarily a technique, for example a business process), and transmits this image to the real world, causing the actual process of its representation. One of the important conditions is the fact that at a time like this is usually no longer encroaches on the conscious control of the process, simply because does not think him as an expert. In other words, all the rest as would give the right management specialist.

The problem is that often the specialist takes a ... and everything starts again not to work :) as people's attention went to their current business.
I know a few people who have learned the technical and working need to keep attention boshe arrays of equipment in working order, but it's still difficult. If a person suddenly gets in some personal trouble, it might all shake down and that he is "kept".
Stabilizer in some way, and solves this problem - it captures the processes of maintaining stability for a long time. In this case, he can replace the "expert." In other words, it can stabilize and what the operator seems to not understand.
It is possible to describe the operation of the stabilizer so all the things that we pay attention through it, or just mental including something (an object, process, community, people, territory) in the internal world of the stabilizer, either through the armature, all of these objects are given in the stabilizer display yourself in the best working form. He begins to reverse the stream of this photo and this affects the object. Ie, instead of our engagement for the stabilization of a process, we used a mold from it with the addition of external expertise, if necessary (if we are not specialists in this process).

For this reason, it is useful to describe the stabilizer through everything that we see regularly, to avoid unnecessary and unpleasant surprises in everyday practice (i.e. transport, elevators, computers, etc.). in this list you can even include a power plant that supplies your city and gas network(just as an example).



The movement of the armature, either of their attention on the areas can have a direct additional effect on bound objects, but can also influence their mutual location if it is provided by us mentally. In other words, we can increase the probability of a favorable outcome, such as negotiations, if the participants maximally correlated with each other. Placing two anchors in one place field (literally on top of one another) we call them the attunement, if the anchor is described as the business aspect of specific individuals, the alignment is exactly on this part...
Similarly, it is possible to cause the opposite effect. Placement of anchors in Homo-and heterosexual parts of the field, is likely to make understanding more difficult.
In cases where a person, for example employee, multi-function, it is possible to describe two anchors or more. For example, the head of the Department can work on the same "frequency" with the staff (they understood it), but he, as a person develops some innovation, can be shifted in the heterosexual area in order to find new solutions or new relationships.

Similarly, an important aspect of the use of a stabilizer is the ability to impact quality in some specific areas. For example, you can describe certain qualities of the room, where meetings and other for the buffer zone around the warehouse. It is possible to describe certain qualities of the apartment, which went for a long time, in order to make there stay strangers very not comfortable.

I recommend to try all these features for a little bit to familiarize yourself with their work.

... to be continued....(probably tomorrow :) )<

User avatar
Смелый
Posts:2720
Joined:Thu Nov 19, 2009 13:19
Location:Владивосток
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 79 times

Post by Смелый » Tue Dec 07, 2010 10:07

Михаил_ wrote: So from the point of view of such knowledge :) You are not right.
It may be so. And perhaps no. I guess that's not the only one sending. The other is also damaged? Random in this world nothing happens. Any accident - nepoznan pattern.
Castaneda:
"Any man like a soap bubble. He sees in the outside world their inner contents, as if it were possible to look inside the walls of the bubble."
So in this case, it is possible to speculate, in the language of the hero of Oleg Efremov in a film "Beware of the car" - "it's a leg, who have to foot".
I don't know who's got damaged in shipment device.
But personally, I would (in this situation) quickly found the grave of a psychic or clairvoyant and asked: "is There I reason I ordered the product came in damaged?"
But I would and I wrote it not for the recommendation of someone using such methods.

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Tue Dec 07, 2010 14:48

Once again I explain - it is the only such shipment. The number of stabilizers Used are limited. Sorry, don't take people for a ride, and we did not have enough of extradural on our head.

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Tue Dec 07, 2010 14:51

Once again I explain - it is the only such shipment. And perhaps, after the shipment of the replacement, the last or next to last. The number of stabilizers Used are limited, and some of them have already been reserved, including Moscow. Sorry, I don't think it should be on this thread. And moreover, in such cases, you need someone to run to the Sens is generally the LAST thing. Because they will nebreda, for normally operating the associative chains I saw one, and he is not the Sens, and I still would trust him only partially.

User avatar
Малика
Posts:681
Joined:Fri Jan 08, 2010 19:11
Location:Север
Has thanked: 251 times
Been thanked: 110 times

Post by Малика » Tue Dec 07, 2010 16:01

Bold, don't worry so much for me, I'm okay. I just come stabilizer further improved. Well written!
I'm sorry,Michael,that's still got from the comments, I could not miss the heart-cry of the Brave.

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Tue Dec 07, 2010 16:07

:) Yes, this will be the most powerful in the series :)

верунчик
Posts:166
Joined:Fri Apr 16, 2010 14:08

Post by верунчик » Tue Dec 07, 2010 22:48

Михаил_ wrote::) Yes, this will be the most powerful in the series :)
And my what, will remain a kitten? :)

Tried the attunement, while at home. The result is interesting feeling.
Question:
- connection NATO-neitro the possible inclusion of the experience of the previous incarnations?
- bond Homo NATO sent for reincarnation?
:)

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Tue Dec 07, 2010 23:21

nifiga a kitten.... do not be shy, your too powerful, but ACC. its tipo=size. Unfortunately, I have not yet learned to do so that they "grow".

1. perhaps to some extent, but in General, for these purposes, it is best suited 3.0. In General, the experience of the past rather a zone of "inhibition".
2. I don't think this effect can be achieved even area stop, and it's not so much the power unit, but in the fact that he is still a projector and a stabilizer, i.e. to cause some outrage in the world beyond its current form far away, in that case, if they are identical to your understanding of the subject. Ie. if at the time of device for You to be so, it could work. Just impact on any human being is faced with its picture of the world which is himself. The impact of using the device can cleaner signal (not contain distracting chatter) the + operator is often more powerful than the impact of the object, but as soon as it comes to the fundamental f-tsijah of consciousness, such as self-preservation, on the scene the subconscious.

верунчик
Posts:166
Joined:Fri Apr 16, 2010 14:08

Post by верунчик » Wed Dec 08, 2010 20:03

Michael, question:
Neutro area - beginning from the "braking" to "development"?

You can consider this: from "braking" approximately 1/2 - Homo in neitro,
1/2 the field to work and 1/2 after work-Neutro.
Neitro in Neutro is "creativity" and 1/2 to "development" is Heterosexual in Neutro?

And on what system divided the field from the center of NATO to the borders of Light ... NATO-Heterosexual-Neutro-or Homo ... or is it irrelevant?

Michael wrote:I have not yet learned to do so that they "grow".

:) Nothing quickly matured :)
Past experience with "slow" in this case, as a library?
NATO I had in mind as a connection with the source, it will be a different experience?
And I would like examples on different topics :oops:
"Grandma give me some water to drink, and so want to eat that and have a place to sleep" :)

User avatar
Смелый
Posts:2720
Joined:Thu Nov 19, 2009 13:19
Location:Владивосток
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 79 times

Post by Смелый » Thu Dec 09, 2010 4:09

Малика wrote:Bold, don't worry so much for me, I'm okay. I just come stabilizer further improved. Well written!
I'm sorry,Michael,that's still got from the comments, I could not miss the heart-cry of the Brave.
I don't mind. And soul to shout do not know how. However in a sign of support I can wiggle my ears, smack the lips, to make round eyes, eyebrows house, to wrinkle the forehead. You which method of support is closer?

Михаил_
Разработчик
Posts:10765
Joined:Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:29
Been thanked: 906 times

Post by Михаил_ » Thu Dec 09, 2010 5:31

верунчик wrote:Michael, question:
Neutro area - beginning from the "braking" to "development"?
exactly
You can consider this: from "braking" approximately 1/2 - Homo in neitro,
1/2 the field to work and 1/2 after work-Neutro.
Neitro in Neutro is "creativity" and 1/2 to "development" is Heterosexual in Neutro?
well ... just about seems so...
And on what system divided the field from the center of NATO to the borders of Light ... NATO-Heterosexual-Neutro-or Homo ... or is it irrelevant?
has not .... division.
Ie somewhere slightly departing from the center, you can find boundaries the world of NATO and on the edge of the border from the pole of one of the. Here and there on the border has some intense interaction (pole series), but the zone is unstable even the one closer to NATO, ie .the boundaries themselves are never stable, or, more precisely, the objects on them is not stable.
Michael wrote:I have not yet learned to do so that they "grow".

:) Nothing quickly matured :)
yeah
Past experience with "slow" in this case, as a library?
like a personal library, stabilizer strongly closed operator.
NATO I had in mind as a connection with the source, it will be a different experience?
well, NATO... it is not a source but a set of principles, source principles influence the interaction between hetero and Homo.
And I would like examples on different topics :oops:
"Grandma give me some water to drink, and so want to eat that and have a place to sleep" :)
I even a month or two is enough on this topic, but other things just distract. Examples will be. And what in the first place?

Петр Петрович
Posts:179
Joined:Tue Feb 09, 2010 18:39
Location:Свердловск

Post by Петр Петрович » Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:43

Михаил_ wrote:Examples will be. And what in the first place?
At least, on the level of safety. Just before you wrote that in 5 regions to obtain personal experience is strongly not recommended, and now like as possible :?

User avatar
Малика
Posts:681
Joined:Fri Jan 08, 2010 19:11
Location:Север
Has thanked: 251 times
Been thanked: 110 times

Post by Малика » Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:44

Смелый wrote:You which method of support is closer?
Image I like them all

User avatar
Смелый
Posts:2720
Joined:Thu Nov 19, 2009 13:19
Location:Владивосток
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 79 times

Post by Смелый » Thu Dec 09, 2010 9:56

Малика wrote:
Смелый wrote:You which method of support is closer?
Image I like them all
:) :o :shock: :lol: :roll: bi :ay :aa :ap :wiz

Малыш
Posts:111
Joined:Sat Apr 17, 2010 2:25

Post by Малыш » Thu Dec 09, 2010 13:35

Michael, as posted in the thread, the picture stabilizer works?, ie as a stabilizer can be used?

Locked